ASMR, or Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response, has rapidly grown in popularity due to its calming effects on many of its listeners. Characterized by a soothing tingling sensation that starts on the scalp and progresses down the back of the neck and spine, countless individuals swear by its relaxation properties (Barratt & Davis, 2015). Yet, a perplexing question arises for a subset of the population: “Why does ASMR make me angry?”

Below, we delve into this phenomenon, citing academic and expert sources to understand the potential reasons behind this adverse reaction.

Misophonia: An Emotional Storm Brewed by Sound

Misophonia, derived from the Greek words “miso” (hatred) and “phonia” (voice or sound), describes a profound emotional and physiological response to specific sounds. While the term itself might suggest a general aversion to noise, misophonia is distinguished by its selective sensitivity. Certain auditory stimuli, often repetitive and seemingly innocuous to most, become the bane of a misophonic individual’s existence.

For those grappling with misophonia, the triggering sounds can unleash a gamut of intense emotions. It begins as a spark of irritation, rapidly escalating to feelings of anxiety, panic, and in extreme cases, volcanic anger. The reactions are typically immediate and visceral, leaving little room for logical mitigation. In everyday environments, this means mundane activities like someone chewing gum, tapping their fingers, or the rustling of papers can become a source of immense distress.

Within the burgeoning world of ASMR, these very sounds are often the main attractions. Designed to soothe and relax, ASMR intentionally employs triggers like soft whispers, tapping, or the crinkling of paper to induce tingling sensations and relaxation. However, for someone with misophonia, these very stimuli can act as inadvertent landmines, turning a supposedly calming video into an onslaught of distress.

What’s behind this stark divergence in reactions? Kumar and his colleagues in 2017 sought to understand the underpinnings of misophonia, diving deep into its neurological roots. Their research indicates that misophonia is more than just a quirk or pet peeve; it has distinct brain-based origins. They found that individuals with misophonia have different neural connectivity, especially in the anterior insular cortex, a region linked with emotions. This suggests that when misophonic individuals hear their trigger sounds, it directly activates the emotional centers of their brains, leading to the intense reactions they experience.

In essence, while ASMR content might be a realm of solace for many, it’s a testament to the idiosyncrasies of the human brain that the same sounds can be a source of torment for others.

Overhyping and ASMR: The Disparity Between Expectation and Experience

In the age of digital media, trends often come with a surging wave of enthusiasm and endorsement. ASMR, with its claims of inducing relaxation and sleep, has not been exempt from this wave. Videos filled with gentle whispers, rustling papers, and meticulous tasks promise an oasis of calm in a cacophonous world. The community’s passionate endorsements and the sweeping generalizations of its benefits have, in many ways, set high expectations for newcomers to the world of ASMR.

Yet, what happens when this promise falls short?

The phenomenon of overhyping is not exclusive to ASMR. It’s seen in various realms, from movies and books to restaurants and holiday destinations. When expectations, set by vibrant reviews and fervent testimonials, are not met, the resulting experience can be deeply disappointing. In the case of ASMR, the touted benefits include tingling sensations, deep relaxation, and even improved sleep.

However, ASMR isn’t universally experienced. While many find profound relaxation in these videos, others may feel nothing – or worse, discomfort. Given the widespread praise, those who don’t feel the expected sensations might wonder: “Is there something wrong with me?” This self-questioning, fueled by the gap between popular testimonials and personal experience, can morph into feelings of alienation and resentment.

Moreover, the continuous exposure to claims of ASMR’s benefits might amplify these feelings. Each video, article, or testimonial lauding ASMR’s wonders might feel like a jab to someone unable to experience its magic. Over time, this can translate into not just disillusionment with ASMR, but active aversion or anger.

Poerio et al., in their 2018 study, shed light on this. While their research affirmed that ASMR did indeed produce reliable changes in affect and physiology for many, it indirectly underscored the reality that not everyone would react the same way. The variability in responses serves as a reminder: human experiences, even with something as seemingly universal as ASMR, are beautifully diverse.

It’s essential, then, for the community and creators alike to acknowledge this variability. Emphasizing that ASMR isn’t a one-size-fits-all remedy can help temper expectations and reduce the potential for frustration among those who don’t “feel the tingles.”

Personal Preferences and ASMR: A Symphony of Subjectivity

Much of human experience, particularly in the realms of art and aesthetics, is woven through threads of personal preference. From the music we find moving to the paintings that provoke passion, subjectivity is at the heart of our responses. This inherent subjectivity extends seamlessly into the ASMR sphere, challenging the notion of a ‘universal’ sensory experience.

Consider the vast spectrum of musical tastes across the globe. One individual might find solace in the haunting melodies of classical compositions, while another might be stirred by the rhythmic beats of hip-hop. Similarly, in the world of visual arts, an abstract painting might evoke profound introspection for one viewer and bemusement for another. These preferences are not merely passive likes or dislikes but are often deep-seated, shaped by a myriad of factors including cultural backgrounds, personal experiences, and even neurological wiring.

ASMR, while a relatively new phenomenon, is not exempt from this subjectivity. The realm of ASMR is diverse, spanning from soft-spoken narrations and methodical tapping to intricate role-plays and deliberate soundscapes. For many, these stimuli can evoke a profound sense of relaxation, often accompanied by the characteristic ‘tingles’. However, just as with music or art, not every ASMR trigger will resonate with every individual. Some might find whispering voices grating rather than soothing, or the meticulous sound of page-turning more disruptive than calming.

Barratt & Davis’s study in 2015 reinforces this perspective. Their exploration into the ASMR experience highlighted not just its benefits but also its variability. They underscored the idea that the tingling sensation, so central to ASMR’s definition, is not a universal experience. Even among those who do feel the tingles, the triggers and intensities can vary dramatically.

This divergence in preference underscores an important truth: ASMR, like any other form of sensory experience, is deeply personal. It’s molded by individual tastes, past experiences, and neural configurations. Rather than viewing ASMR as a monolithic entity, it might be more apt to see it as a vast tapestry of triggers, where each thread holds the potential to resonate differently with every individual.

Recognizing this subjectivity is vital. It liberates individuals from the pressure of conforming to a ‘normative’ ASMR experience and allows for a more open exploration of what truly resonates with them.

Perceived Insincerity in ASMR: Navigating the Thin Line Between Authenticity and Commercialization

The digital age has democratized content creation in unprecedented ways, allowing for a surge of creators and influencers in various niches, including ASMR. While many ASMR creators began with authentic intentions to help and connect with audiences, the genre’s explosive popularity has also drawn those looking to capitalize on its lucrative potential. This mix of authentic passion and opportunistic exploration has birthed a challenge: the issue of perceived insincerity.

For an audience, discerning the authenticity of a creator can be both crucial and challenging. ASMR, by its very definition, hinges on genuine, subtle, and intimate experiences. The ‘tingles’ and relaxation many seek from these videos often rely on a sense of connection with the creator. If a creator comes across as inauthentic or seems more driven by views and revenue than genuine connection, it can disrupt the immersive experience for the viewer. Instead of relaxation, feelings of irritation, skepticism, or even betrayal might arise.

The commercialization of any organic trend often sparks debates around authenticity. From the early days of rock ‘n’ roll to the modern influencers of Instagram, the balance between passion and profit has always been tenuous. In the realm of ASMR, this balance becomes even more delicate. When creators introduce aggressive advertising, overproduce their content, or seem to chase trends without understanding the core essence of ASMR, the audience can often sense that shift.

Janik McErlean & Banissy’s study in 2018 provides valuable insights into this dynamic. While their research primarily focused on the variation in personality and empathy traits among ASMR enthusiasts, it also indirectly highlighted the importance of authenticity in the ASMR experience. The study suggests that individuals who experience ASMR might have higher levels of empathy and openness. Such traits could make these individuals more sensitive to inauthenticity or perceived ulterior motives in the content they consume.

For the ASMR community, this underscores the importance of nurturing genuine creators and fostering sincere connections. Creators, while understandably seeking to benefit from their work, should remain attuned to the core essence of ASMR and prioritize the authentic experiences that originally defined the genre.

As ASMR continues to grow and evolve, navigating the fine line between genuine content creation and commercialization will be pivotal. Recognizing and valuing authenticity will be key in ensuring that ASMR retains its unique power to soothe, connect, and heal.

Physical Discomfort in ASMR: When Sounds Stir Distress

Sound, in all its complexity, has the power to elicit a wide spectrum of human responses. It can evoke memories, stir emotions, and even cause physical reactions. Within the framework of ASMR, sound plays a pivotal role. However, while many individuals find solace in the gentle whispers, delicate taps, and subtle rustles characteristic of ASMR, for others, these very sounds can trigger physical discomfort, leading to reactions as intense as anger.

This isn’t an entirely novel phenomenon. Throughout history, certain sounds or pitches have been known to cause unease. Consider the proverbial nails on a chalkboard—a sound that sends shivers down the spines of many. The reasons for such reactions can be multifaceted, ranging from the structure of the human ear, which might amplify certain frequencies, to neural connections that associate specific sounds with past distressing events.

In the context of ASMR, the focus is often on the subtleties of sound. The nuanced audioscapes, crafted meticulously by ASMR creators, are designed to evoke tingling sensations and profound relaxation in listeners. However, the sounds that trigger blissful tingles in one individual might cause physical unease in another. This discomfort could manifest as a sensation of itchiness, a feeling of being on edge, or even a tightening in the chest. And when physical discomfort is unexpected and unexplained, it can naturally escalate into feelings of irritation or anger.

The research by Fredborg, Clark, and Smith in 2018 provides insights that shed light on this dimension of ASMR. While the primary thrust of their study was to examine the personality traits associated with ASMR, they also touched upon the varied reactions individuals have to ASMR triggers. The study reinforces the idea that our auditory experiences, much like our other sensory experiences, are deeply personal. The way we perceive and process sound is shaped by a multitude of factors, including our physiological makeup, past experiences, and even our current emotional state.

This recognition is crucial, especially as ASMR continues to gain traction. Understanding that not every sound will be soothing to every ear can help guide creators in diversifying their content and can help listeners select triggers that genuinely resonate with them. At the heart of it, ASMR is about connection, relaxation, and healing. Recognizing the diversity of responses ensures that this remains the central narrative, even as the genre evolves and expands.

Cultural or Social Biases in ASMR: When Perception is Shaped by Background

In the rich tapestry of human experience, our perceptions, reactions, and emotions are often intricately linked to our cultural and social backgrounds. These backgrounds influence not just our taste in food, music, or art, but also our reactions to newer phenomena like ASMR. The tingling sensation that many experience from whispered voices, deliberate taps, and other ASMR triggers isn’t just a neural response; it’s also intertwined with the individual’s cultural fabric and societal conditioning.

Every culture has its unique sensitivities, taboos, and norms around sound, touch, and intimacy. Consider the wide-ranging global attitudes towards personal space, eye contact, or voice modulation. In some cultures, a whispered conversation might be seen as secretive or even conspiratorial. In others, it’s a mark of intimacy and trust. Similarly, the act of a stranger simulating personal care (a common theme in ASMR videos) might be comforting for some but deeply unsettling for others based on their cultural or societal norms.

The subject of ASMR, despite its universal neural foundations, doesn’t exist in a cultural vacuum. How one perceives an ASMR video—whether it’s seen as a therapeutic tool, a form of entertainment, or something disconcerting—might be deeply rooted in the individual’s upbringing, cultural exposure, and societal norms.

The study by Janik McErlean & Banissy in 2018 provides valuable insights into the diverse landscape of ASMR reactions. While their research primarily delves into the individual variation in personality and empathy traits among those who experience ASMR, it also touches upon the broader realm of perception. The study, either directly or indirectly, underscores the idea that our responses to stimuli, including ASMR, are never just physiological; they’re a blend of biology and biography.

For the global ASMR community, this understanding is crucial. As ASMR content creators cater to a diverse, worldwide audience, being cognizant of these cultural and societal nuances can help in crafting content that’s sensitive to varying perceptions. For viewers, it serves as a reminder that it’s okay if certain ASMR content doesn’t resonate with them; our backgrounds play a pivotal role in shaping our experiences.

In the end, ASMR, like any other form of content, is a dialogue—a bridge between the creator and the consumer. Recognizing the role of cultural and social biases ensures that this dialogue remains respectful, inclusive, and enriched by the diversity of human experience.

In Conclusion: The Diverse Landscape of ASMR Reactions

Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response (ASMR), with its myriad of delicate sounds, intricate visuals, and personalized content, has emerged as a unique sensory phenomenon, touching countless lives across the globe. Many swear by its therapeutic benefits, invoking a deep sense of relaxation, comfort, and the often-cited tingles that run down the spine. However, as with any sensory experience, its effects are not uniformly felt, nor are its triggers universally embraced.

The world of ASMR is vast, encompassing a plethora of triggers from whispered narrations to meticulous soundscapes. While these might spell tranquility for many, for others, they could stir feelings of unease, irritation, or even anger. Factors such as misophonia, personal preferences, perceived insincerity, physical discomfort, and cultural or social biases play crucial roles in dictating how one might receive and interpret ASMR content.

Understanding these nuances is pivotal, both for content creators and consumers. For creators, it underscores the importance of diversity in content, emphasizing the need for a broad range of triggers to cater to different tastes and sensibilities. It serves as a reminder that while the aim is to soothe and relax, sensitivity to potential irritants or cultural nuances can go a long way in ensuring the content remains inclusive and respectful.

For consumers, this understanding provides liberation. It reassures them that not resonating with popular ASMR content doesn’t negate their experience. Instead, it’s an invitation to explore deeper, to find niche creators or specific triggers that align more closely with their personal preferences and cultural backgrounds.

In the ever-evolving landscape of ASMR, one truth remains constant: its beauty lies in its diversity. And while it may not be a universal experience in its entirety, its core ethos of relaxation, connection, and exploration resonates with a vast majority. As individuals navigate this world, armed with awareness and understanding, they stand a better chance of finding pockets of content that truly speak to their souls, offering solace in the cacophony of everyday life.

Cited Sources

1. Kumar, S., Tansley-Hancock, O., Sedley, W., Winston, J. S., Callaghan, M. F., Allen, M., … & Griffiths, T. D. (2017). The brain basis for misophonia. Current Biology, 27(4), 527-533.
2. Poerio, G. L., Blakey, E., Hostler, T. J., & Veltri, T. (2018). More than a feeling: Autonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR) is characterized by reliable changes in affect and physiology. PloS one, 13(6), e0196645.
3. Janik McErlean, A. B., & Banissy, M. J. (2018). Assessing individual variation in personality and empathy traits in self‐reported Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response. Multisensory Research, 31(1-2), 21-37.
4. Fredborg, B., Clark, J. M., & Smith, S. D. (2018). An examination of personality traits associated with Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response (ASMR). Frontiers in psychology, 9, 647.
5. Janik McErlean, A. B., & Banissy, M. J. (2018). Assessing individual variation in personality and empathy traits in self‐reported Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response. Multisensory Research, 31(1-2), 21-37.

Comments

comments